Thursday, February 9, 2012

Poll number 2: Only 39 percent believe insurance plans should ...

Poll number 2: Only 39 percent believe insurance plans should cover contraceptives

Posted by Charles Maldonado on Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:06 AM

Yesterday, we saw this survey from the Public Religion Research Institute, which found that a majority of respondents ? particularly Catholic respondents ? believe that employers should be required to provide insurance plans that include birth control coverage.

Now, we have this poll, from Rasmussen Reports, whose findings are quite different. The Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely voters found that only 39 percent of respondents backed the federal requirement. Why the disparity?

Well, let's look at the wording of the questions. PRRI asked it this way:

There is currently a debate over what kinds of health care plans some religious organizations should be required to provide. Do you think [INSERT; RANDOMIZE] should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover contraception or birth control at no cost, or not? What about [INSERT]?

Rasmussen, however, put it this way:

The requirement to provide contraceptives for women violates deeply held beliefs of some churches and religious organizations. If providing such coverage violates the beliefs of a church or religious organization, should the government still require them to provide coverage for contraceptives?

(Continued after the jump)

Let's get it out of the way that PRRI is often criticized by conservatives for being left-leaning, while Rasmussen is criticized by liberals for being right-leaning. Fine.

Now, there's the fact that the Rasmussen question takes pains to say that the requirement "violates deeply held beliefs" of churches and religious institutions, while PRRI glosses that over with "there is currently a debate ... ." They're both being manipulative ? PRRI a little less so ?but even that's irrelevant to why Rasmussen's question is deeply flawed.

In PRRI's question, there are two categories of "religious institutions." One is hospitals, colleges and other institutions that are not solely, or even mostly, dedicated to religious practice and serve the entire community, regardless of religion. The other category is places of worship.

Rasmussen, on the other hand, puts them all together. That's problematic because the actual debate here has nothing to do with places of worship or religious bureaucracies. Even in PRRI's poll, 57 percent of respondents said they didn't believe that churches/synagogues/etc. should be required to provide contraceptive coverage for their employees. Which is fine because those are already exempt from the requirement. Yet Rasmussen's question implies that they won't be, lumping all "religious organizations" into one bullshit highly questionable category.

Tags: Rasmussen, PRRI, surveys, religion, contraceptive coverage

'); } var url = "/gyrobase/blogs/Post"; var myStart = jQuery(this).attr("id") == "sortSelect" ? "1" : jQuery(this).attr("rel"); var showAllComments = jQuery(this).attr("id") == "showAllComments" ? "yes" : "no"; var params = { oid: "1953598", sort: jQuery("#sortSelect").val(), ajaxComponent: componentId, startIndex: myStart, showAll: showAllComments }; jQuery.ajax({ url: url, data: (params), dataType: "html", success: function (data) { jQuery("#"+componentId+"_PaginationBottom").remove(); if (myStart == "1") jQuery("#"+componentId+"_commentContent").html(data); else jQuery("#"+componentId+"_commentContent").append(data); } }); }; function doLikeComment(e){ e.preventDefault(); if (!this.clicked){ var oid = jQuery(this).attr("data-commentOid"); jQuery("#Comments #"+oid+"_likeLinks a").addClass("dimmed").css("opacity","0.4").each(function(){this.clicked = true;}); var myCurrentLikes = jQuery("#"+oid+"_rating_likes").html() || 0; var myCurrentDislikes = jQuery("#"+oid+"_rating_dislikes").html() || 0; var thisRating = jQuery(this).attr("rel"); if (thisRating == "Like"){ myCurrentLikes = parseFloat(myCurrentLikes)+1; } else { myCurrentDislikes = parseFloat(myCurrentDislikes)+1; } var myNewLine = '' + myCurrentLikes + ' like'; if (myCurrentLikes != 1) { myNewLine += 's'; } myNewLine += ', ' + '' + myCurrentDislikes + ' dislike'; if (myCurrentDislikes != 1) { myNewLine += "s"; } jQuery("#"+oid+"_rating_sub").html(myNewLine); jQuery("#"+oid+"_rating_sub").show(); var params = { oid: oid, rating: thisRating }; jQuery.ajax({ url: "/gyrobase/Tools/AjaxLike", type: "POST", data: (params), success: function (data) { jQuery("#"+oid+"_rating_sub").html(data); if (thisRating == "Like"){ jQuery("#Comments #"+oid+"_likeLinks a.dislike").removeClass("dimmed").css("opacity","1").each(function(){this.clicked = false;}); } else { jQuery("#Comments #"+oid+"_likeLinks a.like").removeClass("dimmed").css("opacity","1").each(function(){this.clicked = false;}); } } }); } } function reportComment(e){ e.preventDefault(); e.stopPropagation(); var oid = jQuery(this).attr("rel"); var elem = jQuery("#"+oid+"_report"); elem.click(function(e){e.stopPropagation();}) if (!elem.is(":visible")){ jQuery("#Comments .reportCommentContainer").hide(); if (elem.is(":empty")){ var params = { oid: oid, ajaxComponent: "ReportComment" }; jQuery.ajax({ url: "/gyrobase/Tools/ReportComment", data: (params), success: function (data) { elem.html(data); elem.fadeIn("fast"); } }); } else { elem.fadeIn("fast"); } } // attach close event handler to the html jQuery("html").one("click", function(){ jQuery("#Comments .reportCommentContainer:visible").hide(); }); } function closeReport(obj){ jQuery(obj).closest(".reportCommentContainer").fadeOut("fast"); } function submitReport(e){ var params = jQuery(e).closest("form").serialize()+"&ajaxComponent=ReportComment"; jQuery.ajax({ url: "/gyrobase/Tools/ReportComment", type: "POST", data: (params), success: function (data) { jQuery(e).closest(".reportCommentContainer").html(data); } }); } (function($) { var subscribed=false; function showFollowPanel(e){ e.preventDefault(); myPanel = $(this).parent().next(".togglePanel"); myPanel.fadeIn("fast"); } function doSubscribe(obj){ var myPanel = obj.parent().next(".togglePanel"); myPanel.fadeIn("fast"); if (!subscribed){ var myLink = obj.parent(); var myLoader = myPanel.children(".loading"); var myUpdater = myPanel.children(".ajaxUpdater"); var params = { object: myPanel.attr("data-toolsoid"), macro: myPanel.attr("data-toolsajaxmacro"), url: window.location }; $.ajax({ url: "/gyrobase/Macros/ToolsAjax", data: (params), type: "POST", dataType: "html", success: function (data) { subscribed = true; if (myUpdater){ myUpdater.html(data); myLoader.fadeOut("fast", function(){ myUpdater.fadeIn("fast", function(){ setTimeout(function(){ myPanel.fadeOut("fast"); }, 3000); }); }); } else { myPanel.fadeOut("fast"); } } }); } } function activateSubscribe(e){ e.preventDefault(); var myObj = $(this); var isAuthenticated = Foundation.SessionManager.sharedSessionManager().isAuthenticated(); if (!isAuthenticated){ new Foundation.Login.Dialog({ "feelingShy": false, "callback": function(){doSubscribe(myObj);} }); return false; } else { // Proceed doSubscribe(myObj); } } $("#Comments").on('click', ".bottomOptionBar a#doSubscribe", activateSubscribe); $("#Comments").on('click', ".bottomOptionBar a.togglePanelClose", function(){$(this).parent().fadeOut("fast"); return false;}); })(jQuery); jQuery(document).ready(function($){ $("#Comments").on('click', '#showMoreComments,#showAllComments', getMoreComments); $("#Comments #sortSelect").change(getMoreComments); $("#Comments").on('click', 'a.likeLink', doLikeComment); $("#Comments").on('click', 'a.reportCommentLink', reportComment); });

Source: http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2012/02/08/poll-number-2-only-39-percent-believe-insurance-plans-should-cover-contraceptives

christmas tree tax cmas cmas world series of poker joe walsh heavy d dead heavy d dead

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.